|
What happens to PN education and LPN practice in one
state happens to our education and practice in all states.
In my opinion, the situation brewing in Louisiana regarding
the education and practice of Licensed Practical Nurses
must have the national spotlight turned on it to expose
what is truly taking place – Raw Politics.
This is my opinion. It is based on 42 years as a career
LPN, service on a state board of nursing, and service
as president of NAPNES.
For so many years now, the practical nursing programs
of Louisiana have set the national pace with their progressive
education leading to a progressive scope of practice,
held to the highest standards of safety for the public
by the Louisiana Board of PN Examiners. Louisiana PN
curriculum is so progressive, adaptive, and solid that
in 1992 NAPNES adopted it as the national model curriculum.
Here is an example of this progressive state; Louisiana
PN Curriculum includes the sacred cow of nursing known
as patient "assessment". Louisiana proves
that LPNs not only can learn to assess, but can do it
safely within their scope of practice, and are held
to that high standard under state law. There are other
examples but Louisiana handles assessment, a hot button
issue in nursing politics, with distinction. (LP/VNs
in other states assess too – but other state boards
of nursing contort around the word and only manage to
mumble "data collection" in the scope of practice.)
Everyone in nursing regulation knows that Claire Glaviano,
Executive Director of the LA PN Board of Practical Nurse
Examiners, is the toughest regulator in the country.
She is a regulator's regulator from sheer skill, legal
knowledge and understanding of regulatory law. She is
a registered nurse, tough as hammered steel when it
comes to public safety, but extremely fair. NAPNES leaders
refer to her as the "untarnished badge" because
for as tough as she is on public safety standards, her
ethics and integrity are sterling. She cannot be influenced
or led astray no matter the political price she pays.
In my opinion, the untarnished success of Glaviano and
the outstanding Louisiana Board of PN Examiners (comprised
of physicians and nurses – both RN and LPN) to
whom she reports, is the underlying reason for the raw
politics we now witness in this state.
Before I describe the Louisiana politics, let me say
I understand that Louisiana, like all other states,
does not need outsiders to tell it how to care for its
citizens. It is a state issue. However, the Louisiana
entity known as the Board of Regents circulated a document
nationally that describes the Louisiana LPN nursing
education system as "troubled." It requires
a national response, a response from LP/VNs across the
country.
Fact: Section B of the Regents document states that "over
the past four years there is a significant range of successful
first-time NCLEX® candidates…from
100% to 50%." Response: Without variation and standard
deviation comparison, there is no significance to the
"range" and even with variation and standard
deviation comparison, we ask in comparison to what?
Fact: According to statistics by the Louisiana Board
of PN Examiners, over the past four years, the average
pass rate of Louisiana NCLEX® first-time
writers was 86%.
Response: The national average during the same time
period was also 86%. Louisiana's pass rate for first-time
NCLEX® is at the national average. The
Board of Regents reports this as "troubling"?
Fact: There are two sets of programs in Louisiana;
Those under the control of Louisiana Community &
Technical College System (LCTCS) (vocational programs)
over which the Board of Regents has no direct authority
and those over which the Board of Regents does have
authority, or the proprietary programs. According to
the stats from the PN Board of Examiners, from 1990
to 2004 the vocational programs experienced a pass rate
of 92% while the Regents controlled programs held an
average pass rate of 79%.
Response: If the gauge here is pass rate, it seems
to me that in order to bring up the pass rate of the
proprietary programs, Regents should consider turning
its authority over to the LCTCS.
Fact: Section B(1) of the Regents document refers to
a wide disparity among employers "regarding the
competency of program graduates…These opinions
range from excellent to poor."
Response: Again, without variation and standard deviation
comparison, there is no significance to the "range."
The Board of PN Examiners state that in 2003, 72% of
employers indicated they were "Satisfied to Very
Satisfied" with the performance of newly licensed
LPNs. This is an increase from 61% in 2002. Satisfaction
is growing. Yet Regents reports to the nation it finds
this "range" "troubling"?
Fact: Section B(4) of the Regents document addresses
CNA to LPN to RN articulation and infers that articulation
problems could be solved if there was one board of nursing.
Ah, now we get to the real reason highly educated people
are using "ranges" to help the statistically
challenged or uninitiated reader infer that the Louisiana
LPN education is "troubled"... Raw Politics!
Regents wants control and it wants the "untarnished
badge" removed along with the doctors and nurses
that comprise the outstanding Board of PN Examiners.
It must be extremely difficult to maneuver around such
a bright group of people that is nationally recognized
and whose true dedication to public service and public
safety is a national model itself.
I find I am indeed "troubled" by the issue
in Louisiana brought to national prominence by the Louisiana
Board of Regents document. I am "troubled"
by what is, in my opinion, intellectual dishonesty when
credentialed people use tactics like presenting "ranges"
to encourage the reader to infer that there is great
disparity in the PN education without presenting variation
and standard deviation comparison. I find it "troubling"
for credentialed people to use those credentials, that
all want to respect and admire, to destroy the integrity
of programs and regulators involved in preparing skilled
health care providers by circulating such statements
nationally to set the stage for political control of
local education. In my opinion, the obvious raw politics
in this instance is disgraceful.
Louisiana is a shining star in progressive PN education
and regulation. I am counting on the good people there
to outsmart and out maneuver such tactics with the facts
and thousands of skilled nurses known as licensed practical
nurses but it is "troubling" to say the least.
In fact, I am so "troubled" by this bald
attempt to take control of education, practice, and
regulation of the excellent LPNs of Louisiana, that
I am going to contact the Governor of Louisiana and
offer my outsider support for the Louisiana Board of
PN Examiners and the progressive programs that the good
people of Louisiana cherish.
I am stating my opinion because I don't think short
memory should confer immunity on the Ph.D. led Board
of Regents and not hold it accountable for irresponsible
remarks that trash the sterling reputation of such an
honorable state agency without concern for the truth
based on the statistical evidence. Although it is not
a new tactic in raw nursing politics, shame on the credentialed
people.
On January 12th, 2004, Louisiana Governor Kathleen
Babineaux Blanco was sworn in stating that her top priorities
"include providing affordable, accessible healthcare,
improving the state's education system, and creating
a strong vibrant economy." In her inaugural address,
Governor Blanco outlined her priorities as governor:
“We face important challenges in this new century:
expanding our economy and creating quality jobs; building
an effective health care system; improving our roads
and highways; rebuilding our coastline; protecting our
farmers; and ensuring that all our citizens, no matter
their age, have superior educational opportunities.”
(Governor's website)
Given Governor Blanco's priorities and obvious commitment,
it is inconceivable to me that she would allow such
destruction of the proven, national model, excellent
path to becoming a skilled health professional in her
state and of such a strong public safety agency as the
Board of PN Examiners. Particularly when economy, jobs,
environment, etc., all rely on a fundamentally sound
and quality workforce like we find in licensed practical
nursing in Louisiana today. I believe she means what
she says. I hope she will find this national disparagement
"troubling" as well.
If you'd like to respond to this Op-Ed piece,
you can do so by
. Please be sure to include the title of this article
and your complete contact information. We look forward
to hearing from you.
|